@nullue: I like Dr. Ichiro Sato’s article in the April issue of Jurist, overall, but I laughed a lot at this footnote
The principle is that programs and their interpretations are unique and unambiguous, and if IT personnel read laws in the same way as programs, they will not understand that there is a range of legal interpretations and will tend to accept interpretations other than the one they are comfortable with.
relevance - Don’t abstract legal advice.
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/法解釈には幅がある using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.