@mametter: how to kill a proposed language feature extension. Oppose the proposal with a reason you don’t like it → 1 point. If you have a problem with the name of the proposed language feature, you get 3 points. 3 points: “I think it would be better if we did it this way! and make the story bigger and bigger → 10 points @gfx: This is exactly the reason why the JavaScript pipeline operator has been discussed for 3 years and not decided yet…! I think this is exactly the reason why JavaScript pipeline operator has been discussed for about 3 years and never decided…! @nishio: human bug: Seemingly useful statements can be ignored, but [Seemingly useful statement Seemingly useful statements can be ignored, but they accumulate like a trash house and no one can clean them up, thus hindering beneficial change.
- Proposals that seem beneficial are detrimental.
- If it looks useful, you can’t throw it away.
- unable to discard
- big talk
- Large objects are hard to move.
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/話をどんどん大きくすると潰れる using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.