Outcome A
- There are small ones and big ones. kanji āperson radicalā (radical 9)
- Think small accomplishments have value and big accomplishments have great value person Q
- They donāt value small accomplishments.
- Does the accumulation of small values add up to big value?ā People R
- Introduce axis X,Y
- There is a value X that is not based on size.
- There is a value Y that occurs only in major achievements.
- Person Q is talking about Y.
- Person P is talking about the value of X and Y combined.
CI
- Even if you add up the number of non-citations of papers that are cited only by your family members, you will never reach the value of a single paper that is cited by many people. Wrong KPI
- Global Impact
- Value Y
- random event
- Number of papers and patents is a type of KPI that increases as work continues
- value X-like
human relations
- Number of followers
- Close friends
Donāt be so busy working to create value X that you lose time to create value Y.
train of thought
- I thought there are Pās and Qās, I guess (original context is non-citation count, but abstracted).
- I thought I was more of a Q guy.
- On the other hand, isnāt ignoring the value of small accomplishments a resolution downgrade? I also wondered.
- Whether it is suddenly worth a small False dichotomy or not.
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/å°ććŖęęć®ä¾”å¤ using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. Iām very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.