image

Outcome A

  • There are small ones and big ones. kanji ā€œperson radicalā€ (radical 9)
  • Think small accomplishments have value and big accomplishments have great value person Q
  • They donā€™t value small accomplishments.
    • Does the accumulation of small values add up to big value?ā€ People R
  • Introduce axis X,Y
    • There is a value X that is not based on size.
    • There is a value Y that occurs only in major achievements.
    • Person Q is talking about Y.
    • Person P is talking about the value of X and Y combined.

CI

  • Even if you add up the number of non-citations of papers that are cited only by your family members, you will never reach the value of a single paper that is cited by many people. Wrong KPI
  • Global Impact
    • Value Y
    • random event
    • Number of papers and patents is a type of KPI that increases as work continues
      • value X-like

human relations

  • Number of followers
  • Close friends

Donā€™t be so busy working to create value X that you lose time to create value Y.

train of thought

  • I thought there are Pā€™s and Qā€™s, I guess (original context is non-citation count, but abstracted).
  • I thought I was more of a Q guy.
  • On the other hand, isnā€™t ignoring the value of small accomplishments a resolution downgrade? I also wondered.
  • Whether it is suddenly worth a small False dichotomy or not.

This page is auto-translated from /nishio/å°ć•ćŖęˆęžœć®ä¾”å€¤ using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. Iā€™m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.