I made a sticky to write in “[Why invest in intellectual production techniques?

- [[Luddite]] Exercise 1811-1817
- Is it right to increase production?
- Socks are more likely to be mass-produced.
- Increased productivity leads to oversupply.
- If you are productive faster than others, you get paid more than others.
- The same behavior by those around you results in no advantage.
  • There is no point in efficiently producing something that does not lead to customer value.
    • You can’t efficiently produce what your customers don’t want.
  • Customer value, not quantity
  • Understanding cost of customer value
  • As the evolution of programming languages increases the efficiency of program production, the relative importance of the ability to determine “what should be made” will increase.
  • Productivity gains from programming languages have also increased the productivity of the programming language itself, which is a tool for improving that productivity.

image

  • Approach to increase quality and speed by doing the same thing over and over again → exterminated

  • Questioning assumptions double-loop learning.

    • The task of questioning assumptions and breaking repetitive loops remains a difficult task to mechanize.

    • Learn unfamiliar areas

    • Ability to learn what no one knows the right answer to yet.

    • Sustained improvement = good?

  • Jobs to be lost to AI


This page is auto-translated from /nishio/なぜ知的生産術に投資するのか、の補足 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.