image

  • 2 has significant difference but not beyond [the break-even point
  • Whether or not the field finds value in this situation depends on the field.
  • Any system is costly to maintain.
  • If the customer doesn’t pay that cost, it won’t be maintained.
  • Let’s quickly and inexpensively verify “are there paying customers?”
  • Paying customers” = “people who value the product enough to want to continue using it even if they have to pay for it.”
  • Even if there is a significant difference, it’s as if there isn’t enough to pay for it.
  • On the other hand, scientific thinking tends to ignore 3, “a small percentage of subjects are worthwhile”
    • It can be ignored simply because the sample size is too small to make a significant difference.
    • When “one in a hundred has a significant effect.”
      • If there were 100 subjects, it would be “only one was effective”.

sequel - losses and variance


This page is auto-translated from /nishio/有意差と損益分岐点 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.