Russell and the Unspeakable

• (Russell) snowplow and Unspeakable things

• Is “We must be silent about the unspeakable” correct? The debate over

• Rational mysticism p.149

• (Russell) snowplow

  • Even if there are things that cannot be expressed in any given language, it is always possible to construct a language that can speak about such things.
  • That every language $L_i$ has $c_i$ that cannot be expressed in that language, but it is possible to create $L_{i+1}$ that can talk about [$ c_i

• Rational mysticism p.163~164

  • Wittgenstein “Not false, but meaningless.”

• What is meaningful discussion?

  • In contrast, Ayumu Yasutomi considers Dimensions of tacit knowledge as a foundation
  • The process by which value is created is a mystery and unspeakable, so there is no point in discussing it.
  • It is useful to discuss what hinders that process
    • There may be some leaps and over-abstraction.
    • I find it useful in the conversion operation that when “what is X” is a meaningless argument, “what is it that inhibits X” can be a meaningful argument.
    • inhibit X

• Rational mysticism p.165

  • Wittgenstein’s negative resolution by [dragon tree (Dracaena draco)

• Separation of image and operation is impossible.

  • first and fifteenth days of the ninth lunar month (corresponding to new moon and full moon)
  • “Leaving” and “those who leave” are not one and the same.
  • triple steal (baseball)
  • The “leaving entity” never “leaves.”

---

This page is auto-translated from /nishio/ラッセルと語りえぬもの using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.