Anti-Fragility Study Group

  • The book antivulnerability was discussed

  • How do you define antifragility?”

  • Organize the knowledge on which the discussion is based

    • How to quantify the size of [risk
      • standard deviation
      • No change Zero
      • 10,000 is either 0 or 20,000.
        • Standard deviation 10,000 yen
      • lottery
        • Example: 1/20 million chance of 700 million yen
          • Ignore other minor awards because the math is too tedious.
          • Expected value 35 yen
          • 1/2 billion chance of -35 plus, -$265 for the rest of the probability.
          • sqrt(2.45e9 + 70225)
          • Standard deviation is about 50,000 yen
            • It’s like betting 50,000 becomes 0 or 100,000.
            • In general, they say the expected value is about 160,000.
      • reverse lottery
        • A gamble that gives you 700 million with a probability of 1/20 million.
        • This, of course, has the same degree of risk.
      • downside risk
      • Incorrect: ]
        • I was wrong.
      • In general, we discuss not only , but also the downside risk when the point of interest k is defined
      • The downside risk of lottery tickets is…
      • The downside risk of betting 50,000 becomes 0 or 100,000…
      • The downside risk of a reverse lottery is…
      • The lower you go, the bigger it gets.
      • Synonyms: upside risk.
  • Concept of BETA

    • Some random variable X and a random variable Y
    • at this time
  • Assume base asset X is a stock.

  • It is now being discussed whether it might be better to think about downside with respect to this Variance as well.

    • →The emergence of the concept of downside beta
  • The concept of volatility

    • Standard deviation with fixed time horizon
    • I thought about the standard deviation “after the winning numbers are announced” in the discussion of lottery risk.
    • Often the context assumes a change in the option price.
      • Consider “the distribution of prices after a certain number of days” since prices fluctuate continuously on a daily basis.
    • Often write .
  • vega concept

    • Option price differentiated by volatility
    • For example, when considering an option transaction that says, “I will give you 10,000 yen if the price in one month’s time is within 10% of the current price, but I will take 10,000 yen if it is not,” the higher the volatility of the underlying asset, the lower the price of this option.
      • → negative vega
    • stock option
      • Option to exchange “the right to earn X shares in the future” for a current cash salary of 1,000,000 yen.
      • If the stock becomes a piece of paper - 1,000,000 yen
      • If the price of X share is 2 million, +1 million
      • The higher the volatility, the higher the expected value (because it does not go below 0).
        • Stock options increase in value.
      • → positive vega
    • Cybozu’s Shareholding Association
      • Option to earn 2X shares of stock at the present time in exchange for X amount of cash at the present time
      • If the stock price does not change, +X yen
      • If the stock price goes up, well, I’ll be happy.
      • Losses if the stock price drops below half its original price.
      • Ignoring the probability of going from the current price to zero, the expected value remains the same.
      • What are the option prices?
      • The higher the volatility, the lower the risk premium.
      • → negative vega
  • What is Fragility?

    • It is a left-side vega
    • In other words, the same composition as “risk downside risk” and “beta downside beta” is used for vega.
    • Reverse lottery example
      • Risks that are not downside could not distinguish between “mostly gains but very rarely large losses” and “mostly losses but very rarely large gains”.
    • Similarly, can’t a non-downside vega handle the very rare “very high volatility conditions” (base asset spikes and crashes) well?
    • left-side means that the downside is to the left when the probability distribution is drawn with the target value on the X-axis.
  • What is ROBUST?

    • Less fragility?
    • We’re talking about distribution shape stability.
  • What is antifragility?

    • Antifragility is not the simple opposite of fragility, as we saw in Table 1. Measuring antifragility, on the one hand, consists of the flipside of fragility on the right-hand side, but on the other hand requires a control on the robustness of the probability distribution on the left-hand side. From that aspect, unlike fragility, antifragility cannot be summarized in one single figure but necessitates at least two of them.

    • Fragility (downside vega) folded to the right and Robustness combined concept

This page is auto-translated from /nishio/リスクと脆弱性 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.