Anti-Fragility Study Group
-
The book antivulnerability was discussed
-
How do you define antifragility?”
-
Organize the knowledge on which the discussion is based
- How to quantify the size of [risk
- standard deviation
- No change Zero
- 10,000 is either 0 or 20,000.
- Standard deviation 10,000 yen
- lottery
- Example: 1/20 million chance of 700 million yen
- Ignore other minor awards because the math is too tedious.
- Expected value 35 yen
- 1/2 billion chance of -35 plus, -$265 for the rest of the probability.
- sqrt(2.45e9 + 70225)
- Standard deviation is about 50,000 yen
- It’s like betting 50,000 becomes 0 or 100,000.
- In general, they say the expected value is about 160,000.
- Example: 1/20 million chance of 700 million yen
- reverse lottery
- A gamble that gives you 700 million with a probability of 1/20 million.
- This, of course, has the same degree of risk.
- downside risk
-
- Incorrect: ]
- I was wrong.
- In general, we discuss not only , but also the downside risk when the point of interest k is defined
- The downside risk of lottery tickets is…
- The downside risk of betting 50,000 becomes 0 or 100,000…
- The downside risk of a reverse lottery is…
- The lower you go, the bigger it gets.
- Synonyms: upside risk.
- Incorrect: ]
- How to quantify the size of [risk
-
Concept of BETA
- Some random variable X and a random variable Y
- at this time
-
Assume base asset X is a stock.
- If you borrow money and buy 10 times the amount of stock, BETA will increase by about 10 times.
- So-called “leverage”
- Is that calculation really the right one? I’m beginning to wonder.
- [Long Term Capital Management - Wikipedia https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E3%83%AD%E3%83%B3%E3%82%B0%E3%82%BF%E3%83%BC%E3%83%A0%E3%83%BB%E3%82% AD%E3%83%A3%E3%83%94%E3%82%BF%E3%83%AB%E3%83%BB%E3%83%9E%E3%83%8D%E3%82%B8%E3%83%A1%E3%83%B3%E3%83%88]
- High investment performance was achieved, but this was due to leverage
- If you borrow money and buy 10 times the amount of stock, BETA will increase by about 10 times.
-
It is now being discussed whether it might be better to think about downside with respect to this Variance as well.
- →The emergence of the concept of downside beta
-
The concept of volatility
- Standard deviation with fixed time horizon
- I thought about the standard deviation “after the winning numbers are announced” in the discussion of lottery risk.
- Often the context assumes a change in the option price.
- Consider “the distribution of prices after a certain number of days” since prices fluctuate continuously on a daily basis.
- Often write .
-
vega concept
-
- Option price differentiated by volatility
- For example, when considering an option transaction that says, “I will give you 10,000 yen if the price in one month’s time is within 10% of the current price, but I will take 10,000 yen if it is not,” the higher the volatility of the underlying asset, the lower the price of this option.
- → negative vega
- stock option
- Option to exchange “the right to earn X shares in the future” for a current cash salary of 1,000,000 yen.
- If the stock becomes a piece of paper - 1,000,000 yen
- If the price of X share is 2 million, +1 million
- The higher the volatility, the higher the expected value (because it does not go below 0).
- Stock options increase in value.
- → positive vega
- Cybozu’s Shareholding Association
- Option to earn 2X shares of stock at the present time in exchange for X amount of cash at the present time
- If the stock price does not change, +X yen
- If the stock price goes up, well, I’ll be happy.
- Losses if the stock price drops below half its original price.
- Ignoring the probability of going from the current price to zero, the expected value remains the same.
- What are the option prices?
- The higher the volatility, the lower the risk premium.
- → negative vega
-
What is Fragility?
- It is a left-side vega
- In other words, the same composition as “risk → downside risk” and “beta → downside beta” is used for vega.
- Reverse lottery example
- Risks that are not downside could not distinguish between “mostly gains but very rarely large losses” and “mostly losses but very rarely large gains”.
- Similarly, can’t a non-downside vega handle the very rare “very high volatility conditions” (base asset spikes and crashes) well?
- left-side means that the downside is to the left when the probability distribution is drawn with the target value on the X-axis.
-
What is ROBUST?
- Less fragility?
- We’re talking about distribution shape stability.
-
What is antifragility?
-
Antifragility is not the simple opposite of fragility, as we saw in Table 1. Measuring antifragility, on the one hand, consists of the flipside of fragility on the right-hand side, but on the other hand requires a control on the robustness of the probability distribution on the left-hand side. From that aspect, unlike fragility, antifragility cannot be summarized in one single figure but necessitates at least two of them.
- Fragility (downside vega) folded to the right and Robustness combined concept
-
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/リスクと脆弱性 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.