from Experiential Processes and the Creation of Meaningā Study Session 4 Question on p.195 translation Hmmm, I think Iām interpreting this differently.
Since experienced meanings are multi-schematic, the schematic relations between them are created according to their new meanings (17). But if we start from a particular explained relation, an instance of such a relation must be created between two other equally specified and explained meanings, such as A and B. (en)Since experienced meanings are multischematic, the schematic relation between them is created along with the new meaning. But suppose we begin with a given specified relationship, an instance of which is to be created between two other also specified meanings, A and B.
Hmmm, letās read ahead. Although it is missing from the translation, I think the first half is a case where the relation is created, while the latter is a given case. The next sentence is also about a given relationship. The multi-scheme nature of experience allows us to find new aspects of this given relation as well. This new aspect can be ~ed by both A and B Hence, the ānewly created applicationā of that given relation between A and B is also multi-schematic. Even if all three elements, A, B, and relation, are specified as unique.
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/p.195čسęć«ēå using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. Iām very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.