@nishio: honestly, Iā€™d like the option to split into 3 or more clusters, as itā€™s not fun to have 2 clusters

  • teramotodaiki I guess it depends on how dimensional compression and clustering is done, whether there are 2 or 3 groups in pol.is.

  • I donā€™t know if it can be changed in the settings, but in principle it seems like you could do something like ā€œmake it more than threeā€?

    • nishio You can do it in principle.

nishio Theyā€™re divided into four groups. It seems that among those in favor of legalizing same-sex marriage, thereā€™s a split on how to make that happen. image

  • nishio Further divided w

  • image

  • thereafter
  • tokoroten From my point of view, I only see one group, but as the number of people has increased, it seems like the clusters have become connected?

    • nishio I doubt it will ever lead to one.

    • image

    • tokoroten Oh, sorry, I meant to say I only see two.

    • nishio Oh, I mean in that sense, more people got merged. And the two groups have become like ā€œA and not Aā€ and I thought it wasnā€™t interesting. Whether it will become more interesting in the future with the new cut, or whether itā€™s better to re-create it because thereā€™s nothing we can do when itā€™s in this state is unknown.

    • tokoroten In the first place, we ourselves have been rolled up by the ruling party and the opposition party by the election, and as a result, even if the issue is complex, we recognize it as A,not A. I got the idea that maybe weā€™re all just thinking ā€œA,not Aā€.

    • The hypothesis that the two-party electoral system keeps us on one axis.

    • tokoroten A,not A by two major parties.

    • Voting by Election

    • Voting acts as a declarative effect

    • ā†’Thinking becomes uniaxial

    • Iā€™m thinking something rather like this is happening.

    • nishio Some people may be so imprinted with the political messages of opposing parties that they become shrink-wrapped in one-dimensional oppositional thinking, and in the first place, cognitive Many people may have too little ability to recognize only good/bad dichotomies.

      • nishio The case observed this time was ā€œToo many irrelevant questions.!ā€ was interesting. I couldnā€™t recognize it and tried to cut off the irrelevant questions, even though it was just ā€œI subjectively donā€™t see the relationshipā€ because other people were adding them because they thought they were relevant. Do that and it falls down to a simple composition.

@AkioHoshi: The use of Polis: Discussing the Causes of Terrorism shows that setting the agenda The setting of the agenda (agenda) is very important. If we use statements on social networking sites immediately after a shocking incident that is highly current as material, it becomes a ā€œvisualization of the division of peopleā€. Perhaps the original use is to exclude extreme opinions and visualize ā€œreasonable multiple opinionsā€.


relevance

  • Plural Viewpoints: Three different personalities of the AI describe the theme from three different viewpoints by expressing their approval or disapproval of the theme.
    • Derived from pMAGIā€™s idea of dividing Polis into three separate virtual personalities because it is not interesting if Polis is divided into two.

2024-10-20

2024-10-29 All six public opinion maps have over 1000 votes. I was concerned that more votes would converge on the dichotomy. In fact, three cases were dichotomous, three were more than that, and were resolved negatively by the data. Maybe this means that even if the opinion distribution is ultimately dichotomous, it can break up into fine clusters during the ~100 or so cases, and when it does break up into fine clusters, the impression is so strong that when it finally disappears, the disappointment that it has become a dichotomy is stronger.


This page is auto-translated from /nishio/Polisć‚Æćƒ©ć‚¹ć‚æ2恤恫ćŖć‚‹å•é”Œ using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. Iā€™m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.