takiuchi In the end, any “policy that radically changes the environment” is a transfer of assets from the brain-dead elderly to the current generation.
The context is that if we finance health care for the elderly with government bonds, inflation will occur and the assets of the elderly will disappear, and whether this is correct or not note that it was interesting to conclude that any “policy that radically changes the environment” in the end is a transfer of assets from the brain-dead elderly to the working population”.
satobtc I see endless MMTs springing up. If all health care for the elderly is financed by government bonds, The elderly will be able to receive free medical care and the burden on the working-age population will be reduced. If they do this, it will probably cause terrible inflation and end up wiping out all the assets of the elderly. They will end up having to pay for everything themselves. As for the current generation, well, that’s fine with me, because it will wipe out all the debt we have. In exchange for the assets of the elderly.
nk00779 If you can afford to issue bonds and plan for social security in the first place, why not just print bonds and cut taxes first? Social security for prolonging the lives of the elderly, or later, later, later.
janusroad under these circumstances. Even though it is a stagmation. There can be no inflation.
Health Ministry graph ↓
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/環境を激変させる政策は現役世代への資産移転 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.