He says he was involved in Project P. But the leader of Project P said, “What? Who was that?” He says.

These people are not uncommon.

To identify if the project leader was forgetting and terrible or if that person was embellishing the story, I asked him how he got involved in the project and then asked him some technical questions.

  • He was slurred, so I decided he was probably bluffing.
  • The people who actually implement it don’t get flustered because they’ve been there themselves.
  • You talk as if you’ve experienced what you haven’t experienced, and it’s fluff.

I just participated, but I wasn’t deeply involved.

  • There is a difference in the time cost paid for simply “participating” and “being deeply involved”.
  • It is good to “participate first” because without “participation” you cannot make a decision on whether or not you will be “deeply involved” in the future.
  • But it is harmful for someone who “just participated” to act like someone who is “deeply involved”.
  • If you leave these types of people alone, they will think “stolen fruit is good” and stay forever to gain legitimacy through continuity, so it’s tricky.
  • Should be a quick kick.

This page is auto-translated from /nishio/ăƒ—ăƒ­ă‚žă‚§ă‚Żăƒˆă«é–ąă‚ăŁăŸă“ăšă«ă—ăŸă„äșșăźè©± using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.