- Left, comparing in-house knowledge with knowledge that is distributed outside the company to an unspecified number of people, in-house knowledge is more valuable, fallacy.
- Narrow vision and lack of relativization of viewpoints
- It is funny that you compare internal “Knowledge that is not distributed to an unspecified number of people.” with external “knowledge that is distributed to an unspecified number of people.
- Right, actually there are many more companies than the one you belong to.
- Of course there is “unspecified knowledge that is not distributed to the general public” within those companies.
- Bias to assume that what is not observable does not exist
- I know this sounds obvious if you think about it for a minute, but there seems to be a disease that prevents us from understanding these obvious things.
- I think it has been repeatedly referred to as a type of typical big business disease.
Parallel Work
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/社内知識の価値の過大評価 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.