Nodal point of thought 2024-09-12

• For Thumbnail

• The dilemma of acquiring knowledge from outside the company

• There are two channels for information to flow into the organization

• Broad Listening “That Figure” Study Group, I’ve drawn a picture of multiple organizations and broad listening for the first time, and I think something is going to come out of it.

Company’s internal resources

• I don’t know if this is relevant to this story, but it reminded me of a topic I tried to write about before but never got around to it.
• That “the company has internal resources.”
• People who have never belonged to a company have never observed
• Might it take a while to understand if you belong?
• By having some internal resources, a company can maintain a competitive advantage and survive because it can produce more efficiently than with an unspecified division of labor in the marketplace.
  • Resource in Membrane

Sometimes I’m happy to be the hub of information and sometimes I’m not.

• gather information

• Paying more for communication costs - Two types of notifications: “may see” and “want to see.”

  • When capacity overflows, well, first of all, “I can see it” is discarded.
  • Next, reactions to “see me” notifications are cost-saving.
    • Reacting with Slack stamps is an example of such an operation.

• The dilemma of acquiring knowledge from outside the company

• 

• There are two channels for information to flow into the organization

• Both are their own information hubs. Maybe we should draw a distinction between IN and OUT. Multiple Organizations and Broad Listening

• I only painted this IN.

and when the cost of the output is 10, it is easier to put it out in the open field at 10 and transfer it at 1 to each (2) than to do it in two places and get 20 (1)

• 
• and you wrote it as if public disclosure was rational, but that logic doesn’t make sense.
• 
• A separate reason not to do this is needed.
  • for example
    • If the 10 output is in a format that is difficult to transfer, such as audio, it cannot be transferred to B later.
    • If the output in A is treated as an internal document, etc., it cannot be transferred to B/there is a cost of obtaining permission when doing so.
    • (2) and (3) have the same written costs, but there are unanticipated returns from keeping the information in the public forum.
  • for example - At the time of KJ Method Study Session @ Loftwork, I asked in advance if I could make the materials public. - I asked in advance if I could put the manuscript in Scrapbox during ChatGPT Articles @ Information Processing.
    • Regarding the use of TTTC for internal use, I’m planning to write about that know-how in a public forum.

This is just a combination of The dilemma of acquiring knowledge from outside the company and [There are two channels for information to flow into the organization

• We should take advantage of the realization in Multiple Organizations and Broad Listening that “maybe we should draw a distinction between IN and OUT”.
• Abstracting and distributing” is a way to get something IN and OUT without permission.
• I’m rather explicit in asking, “Can I publish this?” or “How about this way of writing?
  • [I’ve cut some of what I’ve written and published it.

---

This page is auto-translated from /nishio/思考の結節点2024-09-12 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.