@ochyai: If we could generate a paper in 10 seconds that would take 5 days to peer review, would we really read it? Would we spend 60 minutes listening to music when a 60-minute music album can be generated in 120 seconds? If communication is the main activity of information consumption, we will move from static packages to dynamic interaction.
- Independent of the context of Content Generation by AI, the transition from static packages to dynamic interactions seems to be progressing.
The way I see it from my point of view, book, legacy format, is a product for laggard. This is the static package. Conventional SNS, on the other hand, is a dynamic interaction, but it is designed with a very short information lifetime, making it difficult to accumulate and reuse information. Therefore, we have been accumulating information in the form of a “dynamic information network” that is not a static package in Scrapbox, and reactions are picked up through Twitter ego searches for a while. In the past few years, with the increased use of Scrapbox as a social networking service, it has become a good idea to use Scrapbox and closed chat for real-time performance. The use of Scrapbox is becoming more and more popular as a social networking service.
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/静的パッケージから動的インタラクションに移行 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.