Misleading profile description
- An employee interview published by one of the companies, who had never been accepted into the Unexplored Junior Program, stated in his profile that he had âbeen through the Unexplored Junior Programâ.
- In the text, it was expressed that âFirst, he will challenge Unexplored Junior, and after that, he will also participate in the different vation program sponsored by the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications.
From the inquiry form on the company website
- There is no fact that he was adopted by Unexplored Junior, and the statement âthrough Unexplored Juniorâ in his profile may be untrue.
- Is there some miscommunication? We would appreciate it if you could check and make the appropriate corrections. I sent an inquiry to the effect that
The corporate website representative promptly replied and removed the âthrough unexplored juniorâ from the profile.
- From the reply from the inquiry form, it appears that the person in charge of the article was aware that the review had passed.
- Fact: Applied to Unexplored Junior, passed the application screening and proceeded to the interview, but failed the interview and was not adopted.
- If you are not familiar with the adoption process of Unexplored Junior, âpassed the document reviewâ would be mistaken for âpassed the entire reviewâ.
- PS: and I thought that when I wrote this article, I felt that it was my personal responsibility to express myself in a way that would prevent such misunderstandings from occurring. Since he/she understands that he/she passed the application screening but failed the interview, wasnât it his/her responsibility to make sure that this is conveyed correctly to the person writing the article?
- As for âchallenging the unexplored juniors,â I suppose âsubmitting an applicationâ is being described as âchallenging.â
- Thatâs a very harsh expression.
This type of miscommunication cannot be prevented in advance, so I guess the only thing we can do is to provide feedback as soon as we find it.
bluffing tries to make himself look big.
2024-02-12 I said that it would be a waste of time to make the latter half of the article, âParticipation in a different vation program sponsored by the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications,â look suspicious, even though that program has a good track record. Then we talked about whether or not âprovenâ was really true (bush snake).
âGeneration Award Categoryâ | Inno(Inno)vation
600 words to change the world! Great technologies, products, services, or even just a small idea can be submitted!
Proposals submitted for the Generation Award category will be selected by a group of cooperating sponsors. Evaluation will be made on the proposal content only. (Gender, age, background and performance will not be evaluated.)
Ah, so thatâs what itâs like. This is another one of those ânot lying, but itâs a bit of a stretchâ to describe it as âalso participating in the hetero-vation programâ.
- In the sense that âhetero-vationâ is the flag waving, in the broadest sense of the word, âhetero-vation program.â
- However, the âhetero-vationâ is not the judging process.
- There is an opportunity for realization after company matching (do as you please, style).
When events like this happen, people in traditional technical fields ask, âWhy are there so many crypto guys like this?â They say things like, âWhy are there so many crypto guys?
- I follow up with, âNo, crypto technology is innocent, itâs just this personâs fault.â
- But then again, maybe the crypto industry is structured to have more imposters. - Innovation and Imposters
- Reputation for the community as a whole will be damaged if the community does not cleanse itself.
- Tragedy of Common Land] type things happen to community reputations
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/èȘ€è§ŁăæăăăăăŁăŒă«èšèż° using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. Iâm very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.