2023-12-02
HiroTHamadaJP A major trend in the metascience movement now is to reinterpret ARPA, SBIR, etc., and to establish a private organization-led technology transfer mechanisms. In Japan, I see it as non-academics preserving the discourse of futurology, etc., which led to SF Prototyping. Looking at the content, the U.S. movement and others are SF prototypical.
HiroTHamadaJP This will cause distortion, but we need to understand this as an irreversible movement and have a vision of what kind of world to create. This is my argument. HiroTHamadaJP This is what you call American-like, but DeSci is rather European-centric.
2024-05-17
HiroTHamadaJP DeSci and metascience are also being reconsidered by DARPA and SBIR. Then we end up with Yujiro Hayashi and Koji Omi in Japan, and we need to look at what their legacies lead to. I wish people who look at the current metascience movement would speak more on the basis of this kind of genealogy. HiroTHamadaJP Distributed science opens up a new ecosystem: the role of DeSci.Tokyo. New Ecosystem Pioneered by Distributed Science: DeSci.Tokyo’s Role New scientific management model for R&D New Scientific Operation Model in R&D | Jxiv, JST Preprint Server Web3 Technology Redesigning Science Movement Web3 Technology Redesigns Science Movement | Jxiv, JST Preprint Server
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/メタサイエンスとSF using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.