February 29, 2016 [Facebook https://www.facebook.com/nishiohirokazu/posts/pfbid02bNBNJkPVwyAaGfPVLk9B6CYckk5AtbaKnqM1cBNQSQBMLcZMspREh1 uwPDs4Gwqxl]
If we are not careful, we tend to talk about “let’s get someone starting a business,” so it would be better to set a goal of “making multiple choices. Show those who don’t have the option of starting their own business the option of starting their own business, while those who only have the option of starting their own business are shown the option of joining a company that will support their project, or licensing their intellectual property.
Since no one knows the correct answer as to which option is appropriate, the outside world, which cannot take responsibility for failure, should not tell you which one to choose.
If we remove even the assumption that “you can’t choose that option,” things will go in the right direction because we are all capable of moving forward on our own. There is no need to be in charge or in control.
relevance - Number of options and quality of decision making
- No one outside should tell you which one to choose. - Don’t let others take on the risks you didn’t take on yourself.
-
Join a company that will support the project.
- Maybe Ontenna - a new user interface to feel sound with hair by [/mitou-meikan/Tatsuya Honda](https://scrapbox.io/mitou-meikan/Tatsuya Honda).
- [MIT Tech Review: Tatsuya Honda: Ontenna developer shows how to live as an “in-house social entrepreneur” https://www.technologyreview.jp/s/313457/trajectory-of-u35-innovators-tatsuya- honda/]
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/選択肢を複数にする using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.