Everyone has their own way of making lecture slides, but I consider them to be âworks of authorship. Example of a different way of thinking: The speakerâs own side is the main subject of the lecture, and the slides are just a starting point for the talk. Some of these types of speakers are very good, so it must be the âstyleâ of the speaker, not good or bad.
Example of considering a slide as a work of authorship
- Background is white for easy printing by the person who gets the slides
- No animation
- Some information is appended in small print that is not intended to be read at the time of the presentation (e.g., links to source papers)
- The equivalent of footnotes in a book
Why consider a slide as a work of authorship?
- It was the largest lecture I have ever experienced and the audience was, I believe, around 900 people.
- Audio transmission in a lecture would only get the information to a mere 1,000 people in my time commitment.
- If you write a technical book, in most cases the first edition is 1,000 copies, and my book has a single digit more, but thatâs not a lot for the time commitment involved in creating it.
- On the other hand, the publication of lecture slides after the lecture can easily reach thousands of people.
- The distribution of slides after the lecture scales very efficiently in propagating knowledge.
Due to the idea of thinking of slides as works of authorship.
- Slides are the main part and the lecture is the secondary part.
- Itâs like âIn commemoration of the release of the new slides, we will hold a commentary session by the author himself.
- For example, if a typhoon hits and blows out a lecture event, I just feel like, âOh, itâs too bad the commentary event was canceled.
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/èŹæŒăčă©ă€ăăŻèäœ using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. Iâm very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.