Jiro Kawakita is an important keystone for thought and broad listening in Japan

share the same sentiment

It is totally unwise to go from a large division to a small division. [One of the critical problems with this method (see Figure 7) is that it is not a good way to go from large to small. This is one of the critical problems with this method (see Figure 7). … In his mind, he has an arbitrary principle of grouping, such as, “In my opinion, it is correct to divide the contents of this many paper materials into three major categories: market research, quality control, and labor management. The company simply applies this dogmatic classification scheme and fits paper scraps of data into the ready-made framework. In this way, the conceptual significance of the KJ method is completely lost.


This page is auto-translated from /nishio/川喜田二郎とブロードリスニング using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.