It would be good if Scrapbox could decide which is the priority among creating a table of contents, reflecting the 4th edition and typesetting.

What would you like to see happen in this conversation? It would be good if Scrapbox could decide which is the priority among creating a table of contents, reflecting the 4th edition and typesetting. What kind of “Scrapbox” is this “Scrapbox”? No bookish navigation, so it cannot be read bookishly without a table of contents. What kind of “table of contents” is that “table of contents”? A representation of the author’s hierarchical structure of a single piece of content

• No bookish navigation, so you can’t read it bookishly without a table of contents.

• Is there anything else about this “Table of Contents”? Can be generated automatically by typesetting scripts.

• No bookish navigation, so you can’t read it bookishly without a table of contents.

• Where can I find this “Table of Contents”? Not now.

• No bookish navigation, so you can’t read it bookishly without a table of contents.

• How do you know this “Table of Contents”? It’s the same as the Japanese version, so I’m just lining it up. What kind of “Japanese version” is this “Japanese version”? Original version of the book What kind of “book” is this “book”? Books on Intellectual Production What kind of “intellectual production techniques” are those? The main focus is on the process of writing a book, but the know-how of how to structure a book on Scrapbox is not included here. Is there anything else about that “Scrapbox”? I don’t think I’m cut out for writing, not bad for translating. What kind of “translation” is this “translation”? The work of expressing in another language what is already organized, finite and serialized in the original content What is it that you value? Hmmm, it sounds like you want to avoid manual work in creating a table of contents in Scrapbox, and avoid having to do it twice in the typesetting afterwards. What is the relationship between that “Scrapbox” and the “Table of Contents”? (And when you want to avoid it, what would you like to see happen? If the table of contents for Scrapbox should also appear from the typesetting script, or) Scrapbox itself does not have the ability to create a table of contents, a human has to do the simple work, which is not good. Is that “Scrapbox” the same as a “Table of Contents”? Is it different? No. It would be nice if it could be generated from Scrapbox. Where does this “Scrapbox” come from? Already there.

• Scrapbox itself does not have the ability to create a table of contents, a human has to do the simple work, which is not good.

• Where is this “Table of Contents” located? No, we need to make it.

• No, it would be better if it could be generated from Scrapbox

• Where is this “Scrapbox” located?

https://keicho.netlify.app/#talk=7fSEefzZTt8qHLxV1uXP #KeichobotLog

This page is auto-translated from /nishio/Scrapboxで目次を作るのと第四版反映と組版の中でどれが優先か決まるとよい using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.