Is Improvement of Disappearing Tasks Progress?

Is improvement of disappearing tasks progress: When there is a possibility that 90% of the tasks T that people perform will disappear due to a certain technology X, is it considered “development” to increase the efficiency with which people perform task T by 10%?

Redistribution of human resources:. - The remaining 10% = work that requires creative and advanced thinking - Improving this efficiency is progress if the task is sustainable and important. - Complementary to, rather than replacing, traditional work methods

Human hands are added for final quality assurance.

• Improved efficiency = improved quality

Symbiosis with Technology:.

• Remaining 10% = Improvement of human-technology interface

- [[Low resolution]] of "Task T." - I'm on "Task T" [They put it in a jar and mix it up. - Even if 90% of it disappears, the remaining 10% has value.

relevance - If you can’t do what an AI can’t do, you are considered less valuable than an AI.

---

This page is auto-translated from /nishio/消えるタスクの改善は進歩か using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.