image

move

  • A word that corresponds to the “move” in chess.
  • In cases where the conversation is verbal and physical, the transcription can be split up with reference to the video recording by hand.
  • In the context of chat and groupware, it seems to me that one post is roughly equivalent to one move.
  • Link” when there is a relationship between moves.

orphan move

  • MOVE not linked to anywhere.

critical move

  • This critical does not mean “critical.”
  • Simply “an important hand” or “a hand of great influence.”
  • Critical backlink move connects to two or more previous moves
  • Critical forelink move to connect with two or more future moves.
    • Of course, at the stage when the utterance is made, we don’t know if it will lead to the future.
    • When you look back on a series of conversations later, you will say, “This move was a critical forelink move.
  • “critical forelink move is divergent thinking and critical backlink move is convergent thinking
    • This is interesting. I have a better resolution on divergence and convergence.
    • For example, in a situation where you are brainstorming ideas about something, you might say, “I think A is a good idea! “I like B!” I like C!” and “I like C!
      • I had taken this vaguely as “divergent” or “divergent thinking,” but based on this definition, this is just a collection of orphan moves
    • Let’s say the conversation is, “I think we should do A,” or “A has a problem called B,” or “Why don’t we twist A a little bit and do A2?” Suppose the conversation is like this
      • This is divergent thinking because the first A is referenced by the other two
    • I think we should do A.” “A has a problem called B.” “If we twist A a little bit and make it A2, that solves the problem of B!”
      • This would make A divergent and A2 convergent.
    • image

This original lincography analyzes conversations, so the moves are lined up one-dimensionally, but what happens when you expand the tree of associations, as in Fireworks to think about or mind-map?

Many one-dimensional chat and groupware tree bulletin board systems have the ability to Permalink. to individual posts

  • Why, because without it, it would be inconvenient to “point to a past post”.
  • So why is it necessary to “point to past posts”?
    • One could interpret that as “because that’s convergent thinking.”
  • It would be interesting to have the ability to analyze this permalink in chat or groupware and highlight “divergent thinking posts” and “convergent thinking posts”.
    • Or provide a priority view of convergent thinking posts for those who want to skim them after the discussion gets going.

Scrapbox

  • Given that a page in Scrapbox is a tree structure of rows
    • Each line has a move
    • Parental line with multiple children in a bulleted list is divergent thinking.
    • Rows that use line links are convergent thinking.
  • Scrapbox’s “line links” are broken by cutting and other operations.
    • Converging statements are the first to break.
  • And they don’t like it, and they copy it in quotes.
    • The good thing about digital text is that it can be copied, unlike audio conversations.
    • But the problem with copying, however, is that it’s a one-way street, and you can’t trace the source of the copy back to the destination.
    • image

This page is auto-translated from /nishio/発散と収束のリンコグラフィーでの解釈 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.