from Diary 2023-06-09
Impressions and improvements in doing Polis
Summary: Impressions from using Polis include a sense of attribution of agenda postings among users and limited data retrieval points, requiring consideration of mechanisms for more effective discussions.
Thoughts on doing Polis. - Questioning by OpenAI
- Those who add an agenda by name prefer that othersā attention and votes increase for that agenda.
- There are users who prefer to remain anonymous and [users who prefer to have their opinions attributed to them
- A system to post individual agendas to SNS like yuiseki was creating would be useful.
- There is an option to create the entire service or tweak the UI layer of Polis to make it happen.
- When using Polis, it seems essential to set up your own instance instead of Pol.is
- With pol.is instances, you canāt take the data out and use it for something else.
- Example of āExtract and Use Dataā: I want to copy the data of opinions posted on individual agendas to āConversations about individual agendasā for the āConversations about agendasā Iām working on, but I canāt do it.
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/Polisćć£ć¦ć¦ć®ęę³ćØę¹å using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. Iām very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.