old title: It’s politics that moves what can’t be forked. OTHER TITLE: No need to play politics with what you can fork.
politics is to move what can’t be forked.
- Paraphrasing: folk No need to play politics with what you can
- So what do we do about it?
- Case: g0v. - Forking the social system
- social inovation legitimates governance
- Forking, social innovation, and if it works well, it will be legitimized after the fact by people deciding that it is a good thing.
- subjectivism
- In case of disagreement, split into two forks
- All forks are allowed to exist and it is up to the surrounding community to decide which forks they are interested in
[/tkgshn/politics to move what can’t be forked](https://scrapbox.io/tkgshn/politics to move what can’t be forked). from [/tkgshn/ If everything can be redone, why do we need governance?“](https://scrapbox.io/tkgshn/ If everything can be redone, why do we need governance?”).
-
Decidim] is a tool for digital democracy, to support the consensus building process with technology.
-
I think this project is a thing that [can be forked without needing someone’s consent.
-
-
Paradoxically, [it’s politics that moves what can’t be forked.
-
I guess it’s “politics” in the sense that you can’t just fork and create as criticism and try to change things without moving your hands.
-
uppolitical game or something sterile, this will be the case. from /tkgshn/gov4git
-
-
-
If we think about it not in terms of this project, but in terms of a larger theme (especially in the case of software)「forkableである」というガバナンスが常にメタレイヤーで働いているのではないか
-
[“If it’s politics to run something that can’t be forked], then voting in software development doesn’t make much sense
.
-
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/フォークできるなら政治は不要 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.