I want to give the new version of Regroup a different name.

Regroup is a reimplementation of “grouping,” which is inconvenient on paper and can be done electronically, hence the name. In the new implementation, we felt that the grouping was not good as it is now, and that the current grouping was not the core of the functionality, so we considered giving it a different name. Next action: Write down the current functionality and clarify what is essential.

What would you like to see happen in this conversation? I want to give the new version of Regroup a different name. What kind of “Regroup” is this “Regroup”? Tools to write down and organize the contents of your mind What is the “content” of this “content”? Pieces of thoughts, things that are on your mind. What kind of “fragment” is this “fragment”? Or words that haven’t been deepened to the point where they can be properly explained. What kind of “word” is that “word”? Probably relevant to what you’re thinking. What kind of “thinking” is that “thinking”? I’m looking for something because I have a problem I want to solve and I don’t see a solution. What is the “solution”? Not found yet. What kind of “found” is this “found”? 👎 have been found

• I want to give the new version of Regroup a different name.

• Is there anything else about this “Regroup”? Originally, the focus was on grouping, hence the name, but the more I used it, the more I felt grouping was not the essence. What is the “essence” of this “essence”? I’m tentatively reading it now as a tool for organizing my head, but it doesn’t feel quite right. What kind of “tool” is this “tool”? Tools to move and think about fragments that have been exported or imported Is there anything else you can tell us about that “tool”? I think it’s important to have the freedom to move it two-dimensionally.

• Tools to move and think about the fragments you have exported or imported

• Where is this “tool” located? immediate

• Tools to move and think about the fragments you have exported or imported

• How do you know about this “tool”? At first, it was a system of writing out and making stickies with this tool, and grouping and bundling them, with the image of the KJ method. As I made and used the previous version, I understood it better, and Keicho started to support the writing out part, especially the folding function. What is it that you value? It’s good to have a clear head, and probably a lot of extra features now. What kind of “head” is that “head”? Thinking things

• At first, it was the KJ method, and I used this tool to write things out, make stickies, group them, and bind them together, but as I made and used the previous version, I understood it better, and Keicho helped me with the writing part.

• Where is this “tool” located? It’s like a receptacle that catches the bits and pieces that come out of your head without spilling. Is there anything else about that “head”? You want to write it down and empty it out and focus on other activities because if you keep it in your head, it’s a blur. Where is its “head”? First there is.

• If you keep it in your head, it’s a blur, so you want to write it down and empty it out so you can focus on other activities.

• Where does this “head” come from? by nature

• At first, it was the KJ method, and I used this tool to write things out, make stickies, group them, and bind them together, but as I made and used the previous version, I understood it better, and Keicho helped me with the writing part.

• What do you hope will happen regarding this “tool”? I’m thinking of making a new version, but I feel like it’s not a good idea to drag the old name around, and I need a good word to describe what I’m going to make. What needs to happen to the “tool” for that to happen? I guess it’s about cutting down on functionality. What “function” is that “function”? Currently, I’ve put in too many things that I thought would be nice to have, so maybe I should write them down and organize them.

• If you keep it in your head, it’s a blur, so you want to write it down and empty it out so you can focus on other activities.

• How do you know this “head”? 🙁

• I guess it’s about cutting down on functionality.

• Is there anything else you can tell us about this “feature”? Writing out the features to be kept: make it a sticky, move it two-dimensionally, draw on it with a pen, zoom, make the sticky bigger, need a different form from the current implementation regarding grouping, making it a block that can be moved together is beneficial, the ability to fold it is inadequate Where is its “function”? It’s in the source code, some of it’s in the manual, maybe not all of it.

• Write down the functions to be kept: make stickies, move them two-dimensionally, draw on them with a pen, zoom, make stickies bigger, need different form from current implementation regarding grouping, make them into blocks that can be moved together would be beneficial, fold function is insufficient.

• What does this “feature” look like? It’s like stationery, you can use it to help you think, but now it’s scattered all over your desk, including the ones that are hard to use, and it’s making your desk harder to use. What kind of “thoughts” are those “thoughts”? The process by which humans create new things

• Write down the functions to be kept: make stickies, move them two-dimensionally, draw on them with a pen, zoom, make stickies bigger, need different form from current implementation regarding grouping, make them into blocks that can be moved together would be beneficial, fold function is insufficient.

• How do you know this “function”? The problem is that there are so many that we can’t keep track of them. What kind of “problem” is this “problem”? Too much stationery. What kind of “stationery” is this “stationery”? Tools to help organize your thoughts Where do these “tools” come from? I’ve added more and more features as I’ve thought of them. Where is this “function” located? In my head, in the source code, and in the manuals. Where is this “head” located? I should write it down because it’s muddled.

• Tools to help you organize your thoughts

• What does this “tool” look like? stationery Is there anything else you can tell us about that “stationery”? It needs to be stable and usable. Right now the pen function of Regroup is broken, so to speak, and the pen is left out of ink, which is not good. For stress-free use, it must be a small number of well-maintained stationery. Where is this “stationery” located? Let’s write it down and organize it. What kind of “do” is that “do”?

https://keicho.netlify.app/#talk=ChV0JCfXeqvHtbyp5JcB

This page is auto-translated from /nishio/Regroupの新バージョンに別の名前をつけたい using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.