The way you write the introduction of the paper, you need to dig deeper in the form of selection of the Multiple Choice. If you omit that and write only the result of the selection, you will not convey the difficulty and the greatness of what you have done. If you lean too much on other choices, you won’t be able to convey what you are trying to say. --- Tsubasa Yumura
- Experience in the brain is a complex network of interconnected structures.
- If you write down suggestion as you wish, you will get a diagram of “[Too many detours.
- If you take only what is logically necessary for the conclusion, you get an “omitting too much” diagram.
- In some situations, that’s OK.
- If you want to talk about choices from multiple options, you need to explain the options
- Talk about a difficult balance.
relevance
- I tried to compare this to the see commonalities when multiple stories are stacked story or something related to this, but I can’t find it in a search because I have the image in mind but can’t think of the keyword… - Story intersections become atoms. - The process by which sentences are created
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/論文の導入部分の書き方 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.