After observing the behavior patterns of various people for a long time, I think there are two types of behavior when there are multiple tasks for which burden cannot be accurately estimated in advance.
- One pattern is to estimate the workload on the high side and try not to overflow. If you already have two uncertain tasks and think there is a possibility of overflow, you do not touch the third one. Filtering in advance.
- The other pattern is to estimate the workload at the low end and get to everything. And if it overflows, filter it down to posterior by doing the higher priority stuff.
Each may have an advantage or disadvantage depending on the situation.
- When doing a task where success = low probability of high load occurrence, it seems more advantageous to sow seeds without fear of overflow.Sowing seeds
- If thereās a disadvantage, itās when thereās a deadline that canāt be moved, or when there are other peopleās tasks that depend on it.
- I wrote that when others are involvedā¦ but thatās a problem because communication with others is falling behind as a task priority, and it would be better if we communicate with them early on to delay or cancel.
Pre or post?
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/č² č·ęŖå®ćæć¹ćÆć®åćę¹ using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. Iām very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.