2018-01-02 Explanation over 4 years
- 1: State of fragmentary descriptions picked up in the book.
- 2: Knowledge in the book is combined but not yet connected to “knowledge outside the book,” such as one’s own experiences or descriptions from other books.
- 3: Knowledge in the book is connected to knowledge outside the book, but not yet determined in terms of importance.
- 4: The state of being able to determine priority (e.g., traffic) by actually using the connected knowledge, knowing which roads are well-traveled and which are not.
I think I wrote this somewhere else.
2023-03-31
- By actually using the connected knowledge, we can see which paths are taken most often and which are not, and we can judge their importance.”
- Knowledge validated by action. - Proof of knowledge through action
relevance - Correctness by [coherence theory (theory that a proposition is true if it corresponds with a specified set of other propositions) - De-emphasizing the “extracted” theory
- I wrote in my column on the intellectual production of engineers: KNOWLEDGE CONSISTENCY.
-
2024-02-24
- Keywords I searched for trying to find this - Network Diagram - Understanding Books - Understanding Books - process of understanding. - Steps of Understanding.
- “There are four steps in which a book is understood, and the fragments are connected to the outside of the book.”
- Found by vector searching with this.
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/本を読んだ時の知識のつながり方 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.