- I was wondering about the announcement of Gradual at name-your-enemy party and the comment, “Partial Common Ownership would be fine.” I thought it was strange about the comment “Why don’t you just use Partial Common Ownership?
(Notes for the next day)
TheirProblem to be solved がPCOとはそもそも違うんだろうなと感じた
-
The motive is “I want to own an expensive NFT, but I can’t afford it, so I want to own it cheap.”
- You don’t quite understand what benefits you’re going to get from this “ownership”.
- I thought they must have some desire for it.
- The problem was the other stakeholders in the market, who were not quite sure of the incentives for the creators of the object of ownership to use it.
- Shinkansen ads that say something like, “You too can be a building owner with our office building unit-ownership system! or something like that.
- I don’t know what part of that makes you a building owner, but I’m sure you make enough money to run ads.
- I think it’s possible to make a trade that sells at a lower price with a high misperception of what “ownership” means by small lot.
- Personally, I don’t find it interesting at all, but I think it’s just “I’m not the client.” so I figured I could do whatever I wanted.
- You don’t quite understand what benefits you’re going to get from this “ownership”.
-
Most of the expected users can’t afford 6 million for immediate cash and don’t have the risk tolerance to withstand the risk of not being able to sell in a year, do they? Then I had a feeling that a service like Gradual for NFT would occur for residential SALSA as well, and eventually the end user would be able to rent for 50,000 per month.
[/Yu-da1/ Increasing liquidity is not the same as optimal](https://scrapbox.io/Yu-da1/ Increasing liquidity is not the same as optimal).
-
I think you mentioned Partial Common ownership and the Radical market, but I felt uncomfortable.
-
The premise is that since I’ve been talking to Mr. Gusan and others and seeing their tweets, my objective is “toliquidity なの」を知っていたからなのかもだけど
I like the idea that after information is shared at the event, thoughts are distributed and asynchronously deepened in each person’s Scrapbox, and then gently reassembled through links in the Scrapbox.
- I thought, “Aren’t Gradual and PCO’s different in purpose to begin with?” I thought so.
- I’m now verbalizing that it’s all about “making it smaller and more liquid.”
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/GradualとPCO using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.