https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jT3riInwd5c Divya Siddarth

claude.icon [[Limitations of traditional classification of economic goods]] - Classification of public goods, commons, private goods, and club goods is at variance with reality - Attributes of goods are not fixed, but a matter of choice (e.g., transition from commons to private goods through privatization) - The [[excludability]] of goods is a matter of cost (e.g., excludability of PDFs through DRM) - Exclusivity should be kept as low as possible to maintain maximum incremental yield

The concept of [anti-rival goods

  • Goods whose value increases the more they are used (open sources, ideas, institutions, etc.)
  • Anti-rivalry is systemic, with some elements of rivalry in individual cases (e.g., language, traffic signals)
  • In anti-rival goods, benefits increase with the degree of sharing
  • To make the system anti-rivalry, we need to strategically consider the balance of exclusivity.

anti-rivalry financing and governance.

  • data governance (input to AI): balance between exclusionary and anti-rivalry through data cooperative and [corelations
  • Internet Protocol: New protocols and standards need to be established to enable positive-sum networks.
  • Anti-rivalry approaches are also useful in areas such as local journalism, [transportation networks

Importance of [collective knowledge mechanism - Implement collective knowledge mechanisms to ensure alignment between decision-makers and affected parties

  • Obtain feedback from stakeholders (citizens, institutions, businesses, etc.) to determine the appropriate balance

Overcoming the private dichotomy (private is a false dichotomy)


This page is auto-translated from [/nishio/Funding Positive-Sum Goods](https://scrapbox.io/nishio/Funding Positive-Sum Goods) using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.