AI fair record and social change
- When AI compiled the minutes of the meeting, it sometimes failed to record what one person said. In discussing this, the new concept of “AI harassment” is mentioned, suggesting that perceptions are changing about how AI can preserve or create social fairness or injustice.
Q: Why didn’t you include Mr. X’s statement in your summary?
- We determined that X’s statement did not directly affect the main flow of the conversation.
- With A, B, and C playing a central role in the work, we thought we could make the summary more compact by focusing on their interactions.
- To keep the summary concise, we focused on extracting the main flow of work and key points, rather than including all participants’ statements.
Summary is a value judgment, so if it’s a “worthless statement” from the AI’s point of view, then of course it will be ignored.
- What does fair record mean by chopped burdock root (and sometimes carrot) cooked in sugar and soy sauce?
- If you communicate via AI, harassment will not occur. but people who say that being ignored by AI is harassment can occur.
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/AIによる公平な記録と社会の変化 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.