tokoroten

I heard a case of information sharing going wrong with slack. / writing demands accountability. If you don’t write it down properly, people will think you’re cutting corners. When you write something messy, the risk is huge when the material gets out on its own. I feel like I’m trying to use flow media the same way I use stock media, and I’m having an accident.

  • Flow and Stock

    • Slack is a chat, not a UI suited to organizing information
    • It’s not a place to spend the cost of writing in the first place, because it will drift away soon after you’ve put the effort into it.
  • Guerrilla warfare between superiors and bottoms up

    • Slack would have made it easier for each member of the organization to disseminate information
    • Picking it up well would have made bottom-up possible.
    • Information dissemination costs] have jumped because of the atmosphere created by accountability and other factors that make it difficult to write in a cursory manner.
    • Slack’s advantages are gone.
  • Atmosphere that does not allow for messy writing

    • How did this atmosphere come about?
    • Excessive quality requirements for written materials for internal communication.
    • Similar to the process by which a product comes to have excessive qualityExcessive Quality
  • There are those who interpret that being a chat means “write fast and short” and being a wiki means “anyone can rewrite”, and there are those who don’t interpret it that way, and when the latter are in a position to decide how to use the tool, they decide to do it the way they are used to.

    • For example, this case study, “Don’t do real-world synchronous communication in asynchronous chat,” argues

This page is auto-translated from /nishio/フローコミュニケーションに過剰品質を求める失敗例 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.