⿻😐😐😐: Ethnocentrism is beneficial if it is defensive, not aggressive
Synthetic Technocracy Neutral. Ethnocentrism, even if defensive, can lead to division and impede the global cooperation necessary for technological advancements. It’s important to remember that shared know-how and diverse perspectives can significantly contribute to the rapid development of technology. While cultural uniqueness must be respected, an ideal society should aim for global understanding and unity. Ethnocentrism could conflict with this vision by promoting an “us” versus “them” mentality that doesn’t value sharing and cooperation.
- Neutrality. Ethnocentrism, even if defensive, can lead to fragmentation and hinder the global cooperation necessary for technological progress. It must be remembered that shared know-how and diverse perspectives contribute greatly to the rapid development of technology. While cultural uniqueness must be respected, an ideal society should strive for global understanding and unity. Ethnocentrism promotes an “us” versus “them” mentality that does not value sharing and cooperation and may conflict with this vision.
- 「グローバルな協力」が「 Advances in Technology 」に必要だからということだな
Corporate Libertarianism Neutral. While defensive ethnocentrism can help sustain a society’s customs and traditions, it must not curtail the free exchange of ideas and trade, which are essential for innovation and progress. We cannot let it impede globalizing forces, which spread entrepreneurial spirit and free market dynamics. Furthermore, defensive ethnocentrism should not justify infringing on individual rights or preventing inclusive societal growth. It’s a tricky balance to strike.
- Neutrality. Defensive ethnocentrism helps to preserve social customs and traditions, but it must not stifle the free exchange of ideas and trade that are essential to innovation and progress. It should also not stifle the forces of globalization that spread the entrepreneurial spirit and free market dynamics. Moreover, defensive ethnocentrism must not justify violating individual rights or hindering the growth of an inclusive society. It is a difficult balance to strike.
- I see,language barrier や貿易障壁が問題だということか
- Japan’s high tariff on cheese is to protect its own dairy industry, defensive ethnocentrism?
Digital Democracy Neutral. Ethnocentrism, even in a defensive context, can certainly help foster unity within a group and preserve cultural traditions. Nevertheless, it runs the risk of promoting an “us versus them” mentality, potentially leading to exclusionary practices or discrimination against those outside the group. Thus, while ethnocentrism might bolster internal solidarity, it could harm external relations and inhibit mutual understanding among diverse groups. Therefore, it is crucial to balance respect for one’s own culture with an understanding and appreciation for other cultures.
- Neutrality. Ethnocentrism, even in a defensive context, certainly helps foster in-group cohesion and preserve cultural traditions. Nevertheless, it also fosters an “us versus them” mentality and risks leading to exclusionary practices and discrimination against out-groups. Thus, ethnocentrism may strengthen internal solidarity, but it can harm external relations and inhibit mutual understanding among diverse groups. Therefore, it is important to strike a balance between respecting one’s own culture and understanding and appreciating the cultures of others.
- I feel like I know the “protect cultural traditions” and “strengthen internal solidarity” effects of ethnocentrism and have a hard time opposing it.
- Because even when defensive, the behavior of “not trying to understand other cultures” occurs…
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/エスノセントリズムは、攻撃的でなく防衛的であれば有益である using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.