- I wonder if [[(computer) format]] of input that cannot be [[edited]] is not ideal as [[Forms of Knowledge Representation]].
  • Editing examples - underline Subtract
    • Write down what comes to mind in the margins.
    • Creating Scrapbox-like links
  • The current editing of paper books and e-books is not good enough
    • Inherently more conducive to intellectual production.
    • Cases where the margins are too small to write in
      • Make reading notes in a separate notebook because you can’t write in the margins.
        • → Books and notebooks are kept separate from each other.
          • Cannot jump from the book side to the notes I wrote reading that page.
    • I want to compare the contents on separate pages side by side.
      • It was cumbersome on paper, but depending on the implementation of the e-book viewer, it’s more cumbersome than paper, degenerate.
    • Phenomenon that output becomes a hassle and output ceases.
      • Unconsciously, we are shackling our intellect.
      • Writing clarifies thoughts: literary work.
  • Creating Scrapbox-like links
    • Bracketing keywords that seem important that come up while reading.
      • Or add the keywords you associate with it.
    • If the page is two hops ahead of the link, it is indicated by a blue link.
    • Strongly support discovering the connection between concepts
    • Forming a network of knowledge

This page is auto-translated from /nishio/編集できるインプット形式 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.