I enjoyed the question, âWould you be happy if your society consisted only of people like your doppelganger?â
In that case I would abolish voice communication, implant electronic communication chips in everyoneâs brain, and be very happy to create a world where âwhat I say and what I think are differentâ or âwhat I want to say cannot be conveyed because I cannot put it into words wellâ etc. never happen.
Response 1: It would be more interesting if it were shaky.
- If you have a system without fluctuations, it is easy to add fluctuations to it when you feel like it. It is difficult to eliminate fluctuation in a system with fluctuation.
- For example, it is easy to create a system that ârandomly disables some wordsâ or ârandomly replaces words in the communication channelâ and see how it interacts, and I would be amused and on board if the other I were to offer to interact with it.
Response 2: I talk about the same thing quite a few times, but each time the situation is different, so I think there is merit in talking about the same thing.
- I am not denying that we talk about the same thing.
- We subjectively perceive that we have spoken about the âsame thingâ in different situations, but in reality we are thinking about slightly different things at different times because the situations are different. We think âthe same thing,â when in fact it is âsimilar.â
- Since thoughts are not recorded, they cannot be compared later and are vaguely perceived as âthe same thingâ.
- If they had recorded it, they would be able to abstract a step further by comparing slightly different thought processes depending on the situation.
- https://rashita.net/blog/?p=26373
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/ăăăăŤă˛ăłăŹăźăŽä¸ç using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. Iâm very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.