@tokoroten: it’s hard to get the point across that disruptive innovation is multiaxial, so I drew a picture >@tokoroten: disruptive innovation is multiaxial. I don’t know if this will get the message across. image

@nishio: @tokoroten Disruptive innovation can occur even if technology progresses gradually

gelidium jelly strips (made from agar-agar)

I miss it. However, utility curves (utility maps) can explain changes in the purchasing behavior of major customers, It’s hard to explain the investment activities for the new Axis B or the activities on the part of companies that can launch products even if they say they are toys… I’m just saying that ventures that can be satisfied with toy sales can invest in Axis B.

nishio

Are we talking about culture within a large company? When there is a product that is generating stable profits on Axis A, and individual employees are asked to choose between “making minor adjustments to existing products” and “developing new markets,” is it possible that only the former is chosen and synthesized in a failure avoidance manner? gelidium jelly strips (made from agar-agar) Yes. It is hard to explain the difference between rational behavior on a macro level, where Fog of War does not exist, and behavior when only rationality on a micro level is known, due to the existence of fog of war. nishio I wonder, is it really due to the fog of war? For example, if everything is observable and Option A has a 100% chance of 1.1 return and Option B has a 50% chance of 3 return 50% chance of 0 return, it would be reasonable “for that individual” for one employee of a large company to choose Option A, saying “I don’t want to play the role of dying” - a common diagram. gelidium jelly strips (made from agar-agar) Yes, that’s what happens when you do a “Reasonable performance evaluation”.


This page is auto-translated from /nishio/破壊的イノベーションは多軸 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.