@igz0: I think it’s a perfect score for complaint handling, but I think the service has lost a lot of its appeal. “If the inventor of the photocopier had taken care that only the author could copy his work, would he have become a billionaire?” The story. In the end, I think technology grows better when it is abused. https://t.co/D4d6oPRhWA
@nishio: very good analogy: “What would happen if the inventor of a copier machine created a ‘copier that only the author can use’ in consideration of criticism that there are ‘copyright infringement concerns’? What would happen if the inventor of the copier machine made a “copier that only the author can use” in response to criticism that it might infringe on copyright?
Midjourney, Stable Diffusion, mimic and other image auto-generating AIs and copyright (Part 2) | STORIA Law FirmImage Generating AI and Copyright
■ What do you think of mimic? My opinion is simple: the provision of this tool is not illegal, and the tool provider cannot be held liable if a user commits copyright infringement using this tool.
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/著作者以外使えないコピー機 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.