People who drag mental models such as Evernote before Scrapbox tend to use tags as “containers”.

  • For example, put the tag “book” on all your reading notes and go around.
  • This recognizes the tag as “the container in which the pages about the book are placed.

But when I listen to shokai and others, I often hear the expressions “link,” “connect,” and “trace. - People remember places not by latitude and longitude, but by paths. - This is Metaphor of the Road. - Link is the way

  • So is the metaphor “any door.”
    • The road is not connected and cannot be traced.
    • → Put the door out and put in a string that looks close to where you want to go.
    • →Suggests some of the places you can actually go.
    • →Choose the right one and the road will lead you to it.

I hear a lot of “we want to make the search better.”

  • That’s like saying “I want a faster horse” at a time when automobiles were being created.
  • I don’t have a problem with sticking with a horse just because it’s what you’re used to.

Lines like “Scrapbox is expensive to learn.”

  • There’s not a huge amount of notation that needs to be explicitly learned or anything like that.
  • I think the real hurdle is the “change in mental models” that isn’t explicit.
  • And the more the mental model changes, the more useful Scrapbox is.
    • However, in the management of nota, “usable without change” is chosen over “usable without mental model change”.
    • As a result, it is difficult to see the need for change because the mental model can remain unchanged and still be used accordingly.

orthographical variants - Box Metaphor

relevance - Discovering and acting on cuts


This page is auto-translated from /nishio/容器のメタファーと道のメタファー using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.