- consistency of evaluation criteria One person said, ”
- In the past, I decided that B should be preferred over A with evaluation criteria as X. Now, I have decided that B should be preferred over A with evaluation criteria as X.
- Now, if X is the criterion, then D should take precedence over C, but it seems to me that C should take precedence.
- But there is no consistency. I don’t know if this is the right thing to do. I was struggling with the idea.
Good.
It was a mistake to verbalize “X is the criterion” in T1 during the previous decision-making process.
- They were unaware that there was another axis, Y.
- He finally realized this when he saw a case where the difference in X was not so great and the difference in Y was large.
It is important to realize the mistake.
-
Mistakes should be corrected.
-
Mistakes in decision-making and Mistakes in the language of decision-making methods are two different things.
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/判断基準の一貫性 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.