from Study Session 1 on “Experiential Processes and the Creation of Meaning Clean language: withholding interpretation of symbols
- clean language : Pending interpretation of symbols
- I realized that this framework could be used to explain how the clean language I presented last time works.
- When a person tries to put into words something F that he/she can’t say well and says A, it’s not a parallel EXPLICATION of course because it’s “not well said”!
- So the FA that RECOGNITIONed by the person who heard it is of course not F
- Stop RECOGNITION there.
- Focus only on the phenomenon of “the other person said A.”
- I understand why the rule is “don’t change the words the speaker used.”
- Using the word A used by the other party can point to F, even if the word came from a non-parallel process
- I don’t know what that F is, but it’s not a practical problem.
- And asking a question to it F generates a CIRCUMLOCUTION
- CIRCUMLOCUTION is the creation of RELEVANCE between experienced meaning
- F becomes clearer as RELEVANCE increases.
- Using the word A used by the other party can point to F, even if the word came from a non-parallel process
- Keichobot’s behavior can now be explained without attributing it to “that’s the rule with clean language”!
- “COMPREHENSION of how Clean Language works!
”
- “COMPREHENSION of how Clean Language works!
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/クリーンランゲージ:シンボルの解釈を保留する using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.