from Participate in other peopleâs projects in Scrapbox Less than two years later, look back and sort it out.
-
Co-editing alone does not create value.
- Lack of catalyst
-
Some trigger will generate content of interest to multiple people in a collaborative editing project.
-
Content triggers action
-
It creates new content.
-
Thatâs what triggers it.
-
Positive feedback occurs that
- chemical reaction
-
[Scrapbox may be a lens that aggregates the interests of multiple people
-
An abrupt metaphor
-
When a person is writing a sentence, the page comes to the top
- Happens in the âwriting processâ before completion.
- When another person opens the top page, they can see exactly what they are thinking and writing about right now.
-
Faster than thought chat
- Even the chat doesnât get shared until you write a line and hit enter.
- Close to voice conversation
-
Response can be immediate.
- In voice, you have to wait until the other person finishes speaking.
- Scrapbox conveys that you are looking there the moment you place the cursor on it.
- If you put the cursor on an empty line, maybe write something.
- The moment you hit Ctrl+i, you can tell that youâre trying to get a response back.
-
This is an example of a real-time interaction, but it can be far apart in time.
- What someone wrote three years ago can help you today.
- [Death Landing
- âWhat Iâve written or rewritten recently with interest comes upâ thereby âattracting the interest of others there.â
- On the other hand, no restraints.
- Notifications do not fly.
- Build a highway without restraint or obligation?
- What someone wrote three years ago can help you today.
-
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/Scrapboxć ±ćăăăžă§ăŻăăźăĄăȘăă using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. Iâm very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.