- One may have acquired as yet unnamed abstract concept X by implicit abstraction from [experience
- At this point, one can look at the more abstract concept Y and feel that “concept X leads to concept Y”
- A sense of “my experience of that or this leads to Y through X, which has not yet been verbalized.”
- This is a kind of Polanyi’s tacit knowledge that “can detect that we are approaching an answer we do not yet know”
- Mr. A is convinced that they connect, but Mr. B doesn’t feel the same way because he hasn’t had the same experience
- B looks at Y and feels that it is a high level of abstraction and unfamiliar
- Mr. A cannot communicate X to Mr. B. This is because it has not yet been verbalized.
- Mr. A can tell Mr. B about experience E, but it does not connect to Y in Mr. B’s mind.
- An abstraction from a sufficient amount of experience must be created in Mr. B.
- However, verbal communication of experience tends to lack information.
case
- U-theory is perceived as a pattern language of change for those with shared experience, while it appears occult to those with less experience - U Theory and Tokoroten
- While Plurality may seem like a seemingly empty buzzword to the inexperienced, ~. - Connection between LLM and Plurality
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/経験から浮かび上がるまだ名前のない概念 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.