image

Hear you say, ā€œI hate AI summaries.ā€

  • Well, I don’t think the AI summary is very good.
    • But I think it’s worth the plus, and I use it a lot.
    • I felt it would be beneficial to verbalize what the negative aspects are.
  • AI summary is also a ā€œsummary,ā€ so it truncates specific branches and leaves.
    • the upper illustration
  • On the other hand, when I read normally, there’s a sense of connection and expansion with what I already have.
    • At this time, there is a sense that we are only expanding one step from what we already have. - I can only accept knowledge that is one step ahead of what I have now.
    • Experience starts with the concrete, and from there, the level of abstraction gradually increases to ā€œmy own interpretationā€.
      • So there are a lot of anchors in me in specific zones.
      • Summarizing and abstracting makes it harder to connect with your own experience.
  • Hopefully the knowledge in the book will connect with your own experience.

I get the sense that you don’t consider AI summaries a replacement for reading.

  • When you’re summarizing, that’s like a table of contents.

This page is auto-translated from /nishio/AI要瓄 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.