AI Considerations 2024-04-27

from Diary 2024-04-27 AI Considerations 2024-04-27

- [[summary]].
- I have a lot of book cutting scan data.
- I have confirmed that I can get about 50 pages into Claude 3 Opus.
- I had implemented it to the point of creating a Scrapbox page with 50 separate pages, and I was thinking, "Should I use the Claude API to add a summary at the beginning of this page?" I was thinking.
- So, while things were busy and pending, [[Fractal Summary]] came out.
- I think this is the right answer, at least as one view.
    - The current situation with book data in Scrapbox is difficult to use.
- On the other hand, obviously this is not enough in some areas.
    - The "order in which the books are written" is a kind of [[time-oriented]].
    - But I want to "extract and compare the parts of several books by different authors that are relevant to the topic.
        - The one that often says, "Read three books and you'll be an expert."
        - This "read" is not "[[read through from beginning to end]]"
        - Then what is it? I think "[[Disassemble and reconstruct]]".
        - Seems to me that when it's supported, it reinforces intelligence.
- I'm feeling that the [[KJ method]] is a bit like the [[KJ method]] in that you can bundle several small chunks together to form a higher-level structure.
    - It is highly doubtful that a chunk of input text is an appropriate chunk for a KJ method label
        - Concepts related to "[[atomic]]" in [Evergreen Notes

• Before finding the connections between books, we would like to first treat “spanning by topic within a book” as a smaller unit.
  • Well, I’m thinking of the Plurality book.
    • The desire to create a good intellectual production system and do international “wow, right?
    • Is it compatible with the “promotion of understanding in the Japanese-speaking world”? Or not?
    • Need a tool that can do both?
    • Are we making the story too big to move on?
  • There are a few people who respond to me in both the Japanese and English communities, so I guess I don’t feel like I have to think, “Which do you prefer?” I don’t know, maybe I don’t feel like thinking about it.
    • First, I make what I think is most necessary as a user, and then I show it to people I think will enjoy it.
    • That’s what I think the conclusion is.
      • Put Plurality aside for a moment and create an assistant to read your Scrapbox.”
      • Plurality Assistant was useful and I used it many times when preparing presentation materials
      • An assistant that reads and generates my Scrapbox is definitely useful to me.
      • I’m giving a lecture on 6/6, so I hope to have it by then, and I’d rather make it as soon as possible and use it to prepare lecture materials.
      • Then there’s the “assistant reading a cut and scanned book”.
      • Where’s the summary story?

2024-05-01

---

This page is auto-translated from /nishio/AIの考察2024-04-27 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.