nishio: this is a very valuable article to read again. Here are the parts of the proposal that I thought were a waste of time. I think itās a waste of time to read the proposal. ļ½Daiki Teramotoļ½note
nishio: If you see āI just listed all the ideas and didnāt prioritize themā and think āeh, Iāve already written a lot, what should I do?ā, you should delete it. I think it would be a good idea to add a chapter āAppendix: Other ideasā at the end instead of deleting it. With feedback, they can say, āThis idea in the Appendix is interesting, too.
nishio: we are not espers and cannot read what is not written. So it is better to have it written than not written. In addition to that, we also want to know āwhich you think is the most importantā, and it is difficult to understand that in a memo that lists all the ideas. So what you have already written should be in an appendix, not erased.
nishio: āItās not a logical argument to say that recent artificial intelligence is great ā this project is great too.ā Certainly. Itās not logical to say, āArtificial intelligence is great these days, this project will be solved by artificial intelligence, therefore this proposal is great.ā I feel like this logically crazy thinking is often addicted even to adults.
nishio: Artificial intelligence does not solve problems, you solve problems. You find the means necessary to solve the problem and you implement them. Sometimes that means of solution is called āartificial intelligenceā in the world, but that is not the essence of problem solving. āWhat exactly is this āartificial intelligenceā process?ā It would be good to answer the question
nishio: The term āartificial intelligenceā is vague, but a characteristic common to a relatively large number of methods is that āinstead of humans implementing a lot of conditional branches, they collect a lot more The term āartificial intelligenceā is ambiguous, but a common feature of many methods is that they collect more data and make conditional decisions based on that data, instead of implementing many conditional branches by humans. is the assumed question, isnāt it?
nishio: Also, since many artificial intelligence projects are of the nature that āyou donāt know if it will work or not until you try it,ā I am also concerned about how to avoid having to announce at the results briefing that āwe tried it, but it didnāt workā when it doesnāt work out. I am also concerned about how to avoid having to announce at the debriefing session that āwe tried it, but it didnāt workā if it doesnāt work. This is a difficult question, and I donāt have the right answer.
nishio: In some situations, āFirst build something that works on a rule basis, then actually use it to collect data. Sometimes it is effective to āuse artificial intelligence not as an essential component, but as an added performance improvement,ā but not all of the time. Often there are cases where it is difficult to write a rule base.
nishio: Related A text for people who want to help creators who want to enter some kind of contest but donāt know how to advise them. [Type Advice for Contest Entrants - NISHIO Hirokazuās Scrapbox https://scrapbox.io/nishio/%E3%82%B3%E3%83%B3%E3%83%86%E3%82%B9%E3%83%88%E5%BF%9C%E5%8B%9F%E8% 80%85%E3%81%B8%E3%81%AE%E3%82%BF%E3%82%A4%E3%83%97%E5%88%A5%E3%81%AE%E3%82%A2%E3%83%89%E3%83%90%E3%82%A4%E3%82%B9]
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/2021-04-12-2 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. Iām very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.