Organized based on this conversation: [Thought Node 2019-10-14 - Scrapbox by NISHIO Hirokazu https://scrapbox.io/nishio/%E6%80%9D%E8%80%83%E3%81%AE%E7%B5%90%E7%AF%80%E7%82%B 92019-10-14]
- I want to make [[knowledge]] look good.
- How do you define "nice"?
- Not looking good right now.
- <img src='https://scrapbox.io/api/pages/nishio/nishio/icon' alt='nishio.icon' height="19.5"/> You're stuck on the "P" in [[PRO Model]].
- Book format old-fashioned
- Can I read a book?
- Shouldn't a better way be created in this day and age?
- Table of Contents
- [[Civil Code Map]]
- The assumption that a human being is going to read it is wrong in the first place.
- What kind of things does AI read?
- search (e.g. for someone using a search engine)
- Keywords → Text
- [[inverted index]]
- This should evolve.
- Man must create keywords.
- Poorly derived results from keywords
- When humans interact, they are not searching by keywords.
- Groupware, Experience, Books, Yahoo Chieftaincy
- [[Return proposed action with situation as input]]?
- Example
- Want to improve poor customer attraction
- Ask your instructor to help you attract customers."
- I don't want to ask the instructor to attract customers.
- →Action proposal: Instead of making a request (instruction for action), why not share information on the current situation?
- Issues need to be verbalized.
- This activity is too advanced and is far beyond the system we are trying to create now.
- Generation? Abstraction?
- It is impossible for a human being to read all the groupware, experiences, books, Yahoo Wisdom
- We need a presence that reads everything instead.
- Brain emulator: [[The human raw brain is inferior and needs to be replaced.]]
-
What’s the point of reading a book and highlighting it?
- Discovering a sharp expression of what was already in me
- Read books and learn new things
- Read understand the meaning of the time difference.
- 「 People have individual differences. 」
- I used to, but then one day I got hooked and started to get passionate about it.
- 「 human bug 」
- It was already noted in Scrapbox.
- After a time, I realized how “important and interesting” it was. - Quotes are context dependent
- Why is Drucker. interesting?
- Bring about a change in mental models
- Drucker does not explain by quotation
- My observations and reflections
- It was written in the textbooks.” Lame.
- The association defines "
" as ”.” That’s lame. - ⇔ Properly subjective Not done.
- a decent subjectivity that springs from the belly
- You have to create your own words to make it interesting.
-
I want to emulate subjectivity.
- Collecting subjectivity
- Interesting subjectivity.
- Need psychological safety?
- I won’t be offended if you express what you think (i.e., subjective).
-
People need subjectivity to be interested.
- ⇔ objective
- Search = ”~ contains keyword X”
- Analysis = “Keyword X appears N times in ~”
- Even if objective specs are good, “boring” will get you NG.
- Majority people love subjectivity.
- ⇔ objective
-
It would be interesting if the listening chat system became subjective.
- What are the specifics?
- preferences
- Propagation from parents to some extent
- Is subjectivity created by likes and dislikes?
- No single system, but a system of individual differences
- A bot that looks at all your Twitter posts and DMs you things you might like
- preferences
- What are the specifics?
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/20191011立川西尾雑談メモ using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.